Person of the Year

What does this title bring to mind? As that same wise person said to me, what’s “Salesman of the Year”? What’s “Student of the Year”? What’s “Teacher of the Year”?These monikers evoke excellence surpassing all others. So it’s only natural that “Person of the Year” bring visions of an individual beyond our everyday goodness, someone who exemplifies humanity.

TIME magazine (I am not linking to the story, you can find it yourselves) has chosen the president-elect as their “Person of the Year.” I get that according to their criteria (mainly impact on the news within the prior year) he is the runaway choice. And I also get that by the same criteria, their covers and stories were in various years devoted to Hitler, Stalin, Ayatollah Khomeini and Khrushchev. However, this year’s choice misses one critical reality: We do not live in normal times.

What I mean is that we are witnessing an attempted coup, a take over of our Democratic Republic by a gang of fascist authoritarians. And no, I don’t need to look up these definitions — their words and deeds tell us who they are. Our president-elect has railed against media, has shut out many of the credible outlets, has tweeted outright lies, has been enabled by the Republican leadership to create his own reality, has called upon citizens exercising their right to free speech to be either imprisoned or expelled from the country, and all this in just the last couple of weeks. On top of this, he flouts all prior decorum and honor, and even the Emoluments clause of the US Constitution, by refusing to divest himself of the clear conflicts of interest inherent in his financial dealings. And already his pockets are getting fuller from his future title — see reports of his projects in Taiwan, Argentina, India, Turkey, and his daughter’s global deals, not to mention foreign diplomats falling all over themselves to book into his new DC hotel.

I come from a country that has passed from dictator to dictator for generations, whose people exists in a hypnotic trance of lies engineered so precisely as to keep them docile and compliant, lashing out only at the state-designated enemies of the state. Like an abusive spouse, Putin the dictator of Russia, much like Stalin and others, has once again isolated citizens from any opposing opinion or a narrative that clashes with his own. Our president-elect has similarly claimed a stake in our truth right here under our noses, with a large swath of the population already nodding their eager ascent, offering their wrists for binding and mouths for gagging.

So, no, this is not a normal time, and it is not a time to feed the beast with the title of “Person of the Year.” Despite TIME’s claim of equipoise, their own commemorative issue on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of conferring this title says this about its recipients:

Here are the great makers of history in our time…

And the Wikipedia entry for “Person of the Year” clearly says the following, referencing the same 75th anniversary issue:

Despite the magazine’s frequent statements to the contrary, the designation is often regarded as an honor, and spoken of as an award or prize, simply based on many previous selections of admirable people.

And furthermore, in 2001 the magazine gave the title to Rudy Giuliani, instead of Osama bin Laden, giving in, rightfully, to the concern over potential backlash from the traumatized Americans.

So, I am not wrong to call out this breach of trust, if not of journalistic ethics, by the magazine in their choice of our president-elect as the Person of the Year, given the threat that he and his apologists/enablers present to the Republic. Other despots and murderers aside, having a ring-side seat in this real-time spectacle of an historic overthrow of human decency and centuries of decorum in our democratic nation, all good journalism must educate and resist. Alas, TIME has conceded to the lowest common denominator.

Advertisements

Welcome to the henhouse

This monster did not spring up overnight. It has been in the making for at least fifty years, since Goldwater lost his presidential bid, and the Republicans implemented their Southern strategy. The strategy consisted of bringing together an unlikely coalition of business interests and poor Southern religious conservatives. The former represented the interests of the true ruling class, the business people with a direct line to the government, while the latter catered to the poor who were still licking their festering wounds from Civil War losses, resented the broadening civil liberties won by African Americans and felt left behind by the Washington elite.

Hold on, you say, these are really divergent interests. How can there be an actual coalition between these groups who not only have nothing in common, but more likely hold diametrically opposed views on just about everything? Herein lies the brilliance of the crafting of the message (a.k.a. propaganda). While the Republican party already had the Ayn Randian plutocrats in their pockets (or actually the other way around, they were in the pockets of the plutocrats), with their help and resources, they could buy the best propagandists in the nation to spin the web of half-truths that would stir up the volatile wasp nest of white grievances. And while the unifying purpose of the entire undertaking was to seize power in Washington, the key to their populist message was religion. By reframing such issues as reproductive rights, gay relationships and women’s equality as feticide, destruction of marriage and emasculation, all encroachments on religious doctrine and individual freedoms, the message of trickle down economics was easy to sell. And when, during the Reagan era, as predicted, trickle down economics failed to produce jobs and financial benefits to the poor working class, the Republican propaganda machine doubled down on the social issues, promising a return to a better, more Christian time.

For the first four decades, the Republican double-speak continued to work, despite the stubborn refusal by the economic improvements, so astoundingly successful in the upper echelons, to trickle down to the downtrodden masses. Exuberant gerrymandering continued to keep the votes coming, even through the Clinton administration. And so long as there was still strife around abortion, venom about the gay and bickering over women’s rights, the loyalists stayed. But the writing was on the wall — something radical had to be done, and that something had to not just implicate Democratic policies in our economic and social failures, but to assassinate them beyond any hope of resurrection. Cue the Koch brothers stage right.

Since the early ’80s, these billionaire businessmen’s battle cry was “less government.” Their outfit Citizens for a Sound Economy was the seed that sprouted the now robust and exuberant industry of so-called “astroturf activism,” or political action funded by private interests by laundering their money through non-profit organizations. The Tea Party, representing the lunatic fringe of the Republican party, is the inevitable 2002 offspring of the Kochs’ agenda activism, fueled by their dollars to bring their “populist” message to the masses. Their platform rests on the tripod of climate change denial, the debunked theory of trickle down economics and a social agenda poised to slide us back into 17th century.

This is surely an oversimplified history of the ascendance of the extremist fringe within the Republican Party. But regardless of whether its origin lies with the old or new corporate cries for less regulation, it has gained not only the White House, but also the majority in both Congressional chambers.

It should be clear to anyone that the primary purpose of this whole political “revolution” has been not to improve the well-being of the American public, but to liberate the corporate interests from government oversight. Regulatory burdens are severe, there is no question about that, and the government bureaucracy can be crushing. But that expression about the fox in the chicken coop? We are about to live it “bigly.” And while the masses of workers will not feel any economic relief, the social repressions, promised for years, are now on the horizon, as Mike Pence, the ultimate concession to the reactionary social agenda, promotes his willfully ignorant policies against gays, against education and against science, as we the people become collateral damage to the off-the-rails white supremacist Republican party’s quest for power. Congratulations!

How propaganda works

Earlier today I came across a report that Steve Bannon, our President-Elect’s newly appointed chief strategist, suggested that Silicon Valley had too many Asian CEOs. This was a year ago in November. (You have to wonder why the HuffPo is resurrecting this story now, and knowing how Bannon operates, also wonder if he planted it.) To this our populist anti-elites President-Elect responded, “When someone is going to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Penn, Stanford, all the greats… we throw them out of the country, and they can’t get back in… I think that’s terrible.”

Dissent among the ranks? Don’t be fooled. This is a strategy, or will be used as such even if a priori it was just a conversation. There are two thoughts I have about how this will go down.

1. Bannon stays in the position given him and continues to lob lunatic fringe ideas into the ether, just so that our President-Elect can counter them and thereby increase his sanity quotient in the public’s eye.

2. The job offer to Bannon is rescinded, which makes our President-Elect look even more sane and even willing to strike a compromise.

Either way, Bannon is a multipurpose tool, on the one hand allowing our President-Elect to appear at least somewhat sane, and on the other winking to the neo-nazi base that their atrocious agenda is represented. And either way, it will make all of us liberals pant with admiration, and we will settle back and watch the rest of the inferno that will be his presidency through the lens of this single push-pull dynamic. This will obscure all the other atrocities going on underneath.

Given Bannon’s cunning, I think he must prefer the first scenario. So we need to push really hard for the second. And stay vigilant and not give our President-Elect a pass on anything that remotely resembles like a dismantling of the ramparts of our Democracy.

This is how professional propaganda machine works.